<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ConsumerSafety.com &#187; News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumersafety.com/category/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumersafety.com</link>
	<description>Consumer News And Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Scammers Taking Advantage Of New Federal Economic Stimulus Package</title>
		<link>http://www.consumersafety.com/scammers-taking-advantage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.consumersafety.com/scammers-taking-advantage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumersafety.com/scammers-taking-advantage-of-new-federal-economic-stimulus-package/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Be careful whenever you are contacted by someone offering to help you do something that is government-related, or if they claim they are from the government. Typically the government communicates through official established channels such as the news or their website. Regardless of how you hear about something like tax rebates or homestead exemptions or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.consumersafety.com//images/scam2.png" alt="Scammer" align="left" height="150" hspace="15" width="200" /> Be careful whenever you are contacted by someone offering to help you do something that is government-related, or if they claim they are from the government.  Typically the government communicates through official established channels such as the news or their website.  Regardless of how you hear about something like tax rebates or homestead exemptions or Social Security checks, be sure to check it out for yourself on the official government website such as www.irs.gov or www.whitehouse.gov (be sure to note the &#8220;.gov&#8221; domain extension on the website address).</p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" width="90%">
<tr>
<td><center><img src="http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&amp;ik=d3929c4eac&amp;attid=0.1&amp;disp=emb&amp;view=att&amp;th=1180fb510ae0f475" alt="Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott" /></center></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><center><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.oag.state.tx.us/newspubs/subscriptions.shtml" target="_blank">Subscriptions</a>        | <a href="http://www.oag.state.tx.us/" target="_blank">Office of the Attorney General</a>        | <a href="http://www.oag.state.tx.us/consumer/consumer.shtml" target="_blank">Consumer        Protection Page</a></font></center></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<h3 style="font-family: arial" align="center">CONSUMER ALERT<br />
Scammers        Taking Advantage Of New Federal Economic Stimulus Package</h3>
<p>Texans        should be aware of a scam that has emerged in connection with the proposed        federal economic stimulus package. Under recently passed legislation, the        IRS will mail tax rebate checks to eligible Texans over the next few        months. President Bush has indicated he will sign the package into law on        Wednesday.</p>
<p>Several Texans recently filed complaints with the Office        of the Attorney General after receiving unsolicited e-mails and telephone        calls from purported IRS agents claiming that the taxpayers are eligible        for “Bush refunds.” The scammers demand taxpayers’ Social Security and        bank account numbers, claiming the IRS will use the information to        directly deposit “rebate checks” into the taxpayers’ accounts.</p>
<p>This is outright identity theft fraud. The IRS does not call or        e-mail taxpayers unexpectedly to demand personal information for direct        deposits. Taxpayers solicited in this manner should just hang up or delete        the e-mail.</p>
<p>Texans who have received these bogus solicitations can        file a complaint with the IRS at <a href="http://www.irs.gov/" target="_blank">www.irs.gov</a> or by calling (800) 829-1040.        Consumers also can report such calls to our office.<br />
<img src="http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&amp;ik=d3929c4eac&amp;attid=0.2&amp;disp=emb&amp;view=att&amp;th=1180fb510ae0f475" alt="Abbott signature" width="200" /></p>
<p>Greg Abbott<br />
Attorney General of Texas</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><a href="http://www.oag.state.tx.us/alerts/alerts_view.php?id=181&amp;type=1">Source</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.consumersafety.com/scammers-taking-advantage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McDonalds Invades Starbucks&#8217; Space</title>
		<link>http://www.consumersafety.com/mcdonalds-invades-starbucks-space/</link>
		<comments>http://www.consumersafety.com/mcdonalds-invades-starbucks-space/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumersafety.com/mcdonalds-invades-starbucks-space/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Starbucks stock has reportedly lost half its value over the past 12 months. A weakening in the economy has something to do with it, as well as a new competitor of sorts... McDonalds.

McDonalds? Yeah, I said the same thing at first. But after thinking about it for a moment, I guess it did not sound that strange after all. You see, I have been drinking McDonalds' coffee for the past two years of my own volition - meaning, I like it. In fact, I like it a lot (with 9 sugars and 5 creams in my large, please). It, like Starbucks, both beat the heck out of gas station or restaurant coffee. But often times Starbucks coffee tastes burned or over roasted to me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.consumersafety.com/images/starbucks-full.jpg" alt="A Starbucks coffee shop in Leeds, United Kingdom" align="left" border="0" height="150" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="200" />Starbucks stock has reportedly lost half its value over the past 12 months.  A weakening in the economy has something to do with it, as well as a new competitor of sorts&#8230; McDonalds.</p>
<p>McDonalds?  Yeah, I said the same thing at first.  But after thinking about it for a moment, I guess it did not sound that strange after all.  You see, I have been drinking McDonalds&#8217; coffee for the past two years of my own volition &#8211; meaning, I like it.  In fact, I like it a lot (with 9 sugars and 5 creams in my large, please).  It, like Starbucks, both beat the heck out of gas station or restaurant coffee.  But often times Starbucks coffee tastes burned or over roasted to me.  However, I still enjoy coffee drinks at Starbucks, even if their regular coffee has now has a new rival.  But, that is exactly where McDonalds plans to take aim &#8211; in the specialty coffee drinks market.</p>
<p>Last week I heard that a Starbucks in Seattle is now offering a cup of coffee for a dollar.  It is called a &#8220;short&#8221;.  I would assume that it is shorter than their &#8220;tall&#8221;, which I have always known as their shortest.  Perhaps Starbucks is getting serious, now that McDonalds is. It will be interesting to see how the beans roast on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.consumersafety.com/mcdonalds-invades-starbucks-space/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blu-ray Edges Ahead in the Format Battle</title>
		<link>http://www.consumersafety.com/blu-ray-edges-ahead-in-the-format-battle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.consumersafety.com/blu-ray-edges-ahead-in-the-format-battle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumersafety.com/blu-ray-edges-ahead-in-the-format-battle/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the ongoing saga over whether HD DVD or Blu-ray will be the ultimate DVD standard, Blu-ray just moved ahead with backing from Warner Brothers Studios.

We'll find out soon enough if the format battle will finally be over, it surely will make things easier for the consumer and prevent any inconvenience due to movie releases only being available in one particular format.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.consumersafety.com//images/blu-ray-vs-hd-dvd.png" alt="Bluray versus HD DVD" align="left" height="202" hspace="15" width="252" />In the ongoing saga over whether HD DVD or Blu-ray will be the ultimate DVD standard, Blu-ray just moved ahead with backing from Warner Brothers Studios.  Currently Blue-ray represents about 70% of the market.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll find out soon enough if the format battle will finally be over, it surely will make things easier for the consumer and prevent any inconvenience due to movie releases only being available in one particular format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.consumersafety.com/blu-ray-edges-ahead-in-the-format-battle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watch for Oil Change Place Scams</title>
		<link>http://www.consumersafety.com/watch-for-oil-change-place-scams/</link>
		<comments>http://www.consumersafety.com/watch-for-oil-change-place-scams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 01:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumersafety.com/watch-for-oil-change-place-scams/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes I get my oil changed at Wal-Mart or Kwik Kar because the trouble saved with messing with the under pan on a Lexus is worth the extra money. But with my Suburban, I do it myself because it is so high off the ground it doesn't need to be jacked up. It takes less than 15 minutes, and I save enough money for a dinner out.

There is nothing wrong with using an oil change services provider, unless…]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Arial">Sometimes I get my oil changed at Wal-Mart or Kwik Kar because the trouble saved with messing with the under pan on a Lexus is worth the extra money.  But with my Suburban, I do it myself because it is so high off the ground it doesn&#8217;t need to be jacked up.  It takes less than 15 minutes, and I save enough money for a dinner out.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial">There is nothing wrong with using an oil change services provider, unless…</span></p>
<p><span id="more-34"></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial">…unless they rip you off!  Recently there was a report of such an oil change franchise that had a company policy that said something like &#8220;Do not let any customer out the door for less than $70.&#8221;  So what they were instructed to do was find something wrong or that needed be serviced also; like &#8220;you need a new fuel filter, or belts, or shocks&#8221;.  Or, &#8220;you need your transmission fluid and filter changed.&#8221;  Whatever it took to hit the seventy dollar mark.  (That was EZ Lube in California).<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial">Of course those items mentioned above are all things that need to be taken care of at one time or another.  So, being familiar with your vehicle&#8217;s scheduled maintenance is your best bet.  But if you find that your simple oil changes are consistently exceeding your intended price and goal, then you should be aware that the reason might not necessarily be in your best interest.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial">One tip for your consumer safety is to get a recommendation from a friend, or check with your local chamber of commerce for a reputable and trustworthy servicer.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial">Happy Trails!</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.consumersafety.com/watch-for-oil-change-place-scams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Airline Passenger Rights Law Is On The Move!</title>
		<link>http://www.consumersafety.com/airline-passenger-rights-law-is-on-the-move/</link>
		<comments>http://www.consumersafety.com/airline-passenger-rights-law-is-on-the-move/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ConsumerSafety Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumersafety.com/airline-passenger-rights-law-is-on-the-move/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, at least for the state New York &#8211; being trapped due to flight delays may in the future not be as horrible as it can be now.  Under a new state law that is expected to take effect on January 1st, called the Airline Passengers&#8217; Bill of Rights, airlines must provide &#8220;fresh air&#8221; and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, at least for the state New York &#8211; being trapped due to flight delays may in the future not be as horrible as it can be now.  Under a new state law that is expected to take effect on January 1st, called the <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2008/01/02/2008-01-02_passenger_bill_of_rights_for_ny_runways.html">Airline Passengers&#8217; Bill of Rights</a>, airlines must provide &#8220;fresh air&#8221; and &#8220;adequate food and drinking water&#8221; and there are violation penalties involved for the airliners&#8230; up to $1,000 per passenger.</p>
<p>This is an <a href="http://travel.latimes.com/articles/la-trw-rights28jan06">interesting development</a> and hopefully passengers will receive some more deserved respect and better service in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.consumersafety.com/airline-passenger-rights-law-is-on-the-move/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>February 17, 2009 Ends the Era of Analog TV.  Get Converter Coupons, or Get HDTV.</title>
		<link>http://www.consumersafety.com/february-17-2009-ends-the-era-of-analog-tv-get-converter-coupons-or-get-hdtv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.consumersafety.com/february-17-2009-ends-the-era-of-analog-tv-get-converter-coupons-or-get-hdtv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ConsumerSafety Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumersafety.com/february-17-2009-ends-the-era-of-analog-tv-get-converter-coupons-or-get-hdtv/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, Jan. 1, was the first date that you could apply for coupons for digital-to-analog converter boxes. They will take the digital-TV signals and convert them to analog so that your current or older analog set will still be usable after analog transmitters are turned off on Feb. 17, 2009. The boxes are expected to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.consumersafety.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/tv_180px-braun_hf_1.jpg" alt="tv_180px-braun_hf_1.jpg" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" />Yesterday, Jan. 1, was the first date that you could apply for coupons for digital-to-analog converter boxes. They will take the digital-TV signals and convert them to analog so that your current or older analog set will still be usable after analog transmitters are turned off on Feb. 17, 2009.</p>
<p>The boxes are expected to sell for between $50 to $70. You may apply for two $40 coupons to use toward the purchase of these boxes, one coupon per box. The coupons expire 90 days after they are issued, so BE SURE you are ready to make your purchase before you apply&#8230;<br />
<span id="more-24"></span><br />
The converter boxes will be available in February, so you may want to look into the features of the boxes before you commit to buy.</p>
<p>Be sure to check out some reviews before purchasing.</p>
<p>You may apply for the coupons in three ways:</p>
<ul>
<li> By phone:  888.388.2009</li>
<li> Online:  <a href="http://www.dtv2009.gov/" target="_blank">www.dtv2009.gov</a></li>
<li> By mail:  Send completed application or request to:</li>
</ul>
<blockquote><p>TV Converter Box Program<br />
P.O. Box 2000<br />
Portland, OR  97208</p></blockquote>
<p>The following is the list of currently approved Coupon-Eligible Converter Boxes (CECBs).</p>
<ul>
<li>DigitalSTREAM D2A1D10</li>
<li>DigitalSTREAM D2A1D20</li>
<li>Zenith DTT900</li>
<li>Magnavox TB100MW9</li>
<li>Philco TB150HH9</li>
<li>Sansonic FT300A</li>
<li>Philco TB100HH9</li>
<li>MicroGEM MG2000</li>
<li>Sansonic FT300RT</li>
<li>MaxMedia MMDTVB03</li>
<li>Apex DT1001</li>
<li>ECHOSTAR TR-40</li>
<li>AMTC AT-2016</li>
</ul>
<p>Check for updates at <a href="http://www.ntiadtv.gov/cecb_list.cfm" target="_blank">http://www.ntiadtv.gov/cecb_list.cfm</a>. Big box retailers who will participate in the program include, but are not limited to the following:</p>
<p>•Best Buy<br />
•Circuit City<br />
•KMart<br />
•Radio Shack<br />
•Sam&#8217;s Club<br />
•Sears<br />
•Target<br />
•True Value Hardware<br />
•WAL-MART</p>
<p>A complete listing can be found at:<br />
<a href="http://www.ntia.doc.gov/dtvcoupon/NTIA_DTV_121107.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.ntia.doc.gov/dtvcoupon/NTIA_DTV_121107.pdf</a></p>
<p>The National Association of Broadcasters estimates that as many as 70,000,000 TV sets are connected by antennas. However, there is only enough money for about 30,000,000 coupons. So, we can only assume it will be first-come, first-served.</p>
<p>Incidentally, it is the NTIA, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (a division of the Commerce Department) that is administering this program &#8211; not the FCC.</p>
<p>Watch carefully, read the specs, make sure which brand and model you want.  Get more information at <a href="http://dtvfacts.com/" target="_blank">DTV Facts</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.consumersafety.com/february-17-2009-ends-the-era-of-analog-tv-get-converter-coupons-or-get-hdtv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government Restricts Lithium Batteries From Checked Bags</title>
		<link>http://www.consumersafety.com/government-restricts-lithium-batteries-from-checked-bags/</link>
		<comments>http://www.consumersafety.com/government-restricts-lithium-batteries-from-checked-bags/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 02:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ConsumerSafety Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumersafety.com/government-restricts-lithium-batteries-from-checked-bags/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Due to a new federal safety rule that is effective January 1, 2008, passengers are no longer be able to pack loose lithium batteries in checked luggage. Batteries are still allowed in their respecitve devices, regardless of whether checked or carry-on (in plastic bags), or extra batteries can be loose if carried on. That impacts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.consumersafety.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/800px-lithium_ion.JPG" alt="800px-lithium_ion.JPG" align="right" height="201" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="278" />Due to a new federal safety rule that is effective January 1, 2008, passengers are no longer be able to pack loose lithium batteries in checked luggage.   Batteries are still allowed in their respecitve devices, regardless of whether checked or carry-on (in plastic bags), or extra batteries can be loose if carried on.  That impacts notebook computers, mobile phones, PDAs, digital cameras, and other personal consumer devices that use lithium ion batteries.</p>
<p>Here is what the US Department Of Transportation says on their website:</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p><span id="more-22"></span></p>
<blockquote>
<p class="body_copy">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="body_copy">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="body_copy">If you&#8217;re planning a trip, bring your laptop computer, cell phone, camera, personal digital assistant, or other battery-powered device along. These items are safe to fly with!</p>
<p class="body_copy">Batteries pose little risk contained in the devices they power. Taking the battery out of the device does not enhance safety. To be safest, carry the device with you, not in your checked baggage. Do not remove the battery!</p>
<p class="body_copy">Carry your battery-powered devices or spare batteries in your carry-on baggage. In the passenger compartment, flight crews can better monitor safety conditions to prevent an incident, and can access fire extinguishers, if an incident does happen.</p>
<p class="body_copy">Finally, if you must carry a battery-powered device in your checked baggage, package it to prevent inadvertent activation. Cordless power tools, for instance, should be packed in a protective case, with a trigger lock engaged.</p>
<p class="body_copy">Many travelers like the convenience of readily available spare batteries. It&#8217;s safe to travel with spare batteries, as long as you follow these simple spare battery <a href="http://safetravel.dot.gov/tips.html">tips</a>.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.consumersafety.com/government-restricts-lithium-batteries-from-checked-bags/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shopping Channel HSN Agrees to Pay $875,000 Civil Penalty</title>
		<link>http://www.consumersafety.com/shopping-channel-hsn-agrees-to-pay-875000-civil-penalty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.consumersafety.com/shopping-channel-hsn-agrees-to-pay-875000-civil-penalty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 01:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ConsumerSafety Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumersafety.com/shopping-channel-hsn-agrees-to-pay-875000-civil-penalty/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consumer Product Safety Commission reports: WASHINGTON, D.C. &#8211; The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced today that HSN LP (previously known as Home Shopping Network), of St. Petersburg, Fla., has agreed (pdf) to pay a civil penalty of $875,000. The civil penalty settles allegations that HSN LP failed to report in a timely manner, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.consumersafety.com/shopping-channel-hsn-agrees-to-pay-875000-civil-penalty/9/" rel="attachment wp-att-9" title="pressurecooker2007-12-27.jpg"><img src="http://consumersafety.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/pressurecooker2007-12-27.jpg" alt="pressurecooker2007-12-27.jpg" align="left" /></a></p>
<p>Consumer Product Safety Commission reports:</p>
<p><font face="Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular" size="2">WASHINGTON, D.C. &#8211; The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced today that HSN LP (previously known as Home Shopping Network), of St. Petersburg, Fla., has <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml08/08153.pdf">agreed (pdf)</a> to pay a civil penalty of $875,000. The civil penalty settles allegations that HSN LP failed to report in a timely manner, as required by federal law, serious injuries and hazards with the Welbilt Electronic Pressure Cookers.</font><br />
<span id="more-10"></span><br />
<font face="Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular" size="2">CPSC alleged that from September 2001 through about October 2004, HSN received at least 25 reports from consumers indicating that the pressure cookers contained a defect that could create a substantial product hazard or that the pressure cookers created an unreasonable risk of serious injury. CPSC alleged that HSN failed to immediately report this information as required by federal law. HSN LP finally reported information to CPSC in February 2005. In June and October 2005, these pressure cookers were the subject of a <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml05/05579.html">recall</a>.</font></p>
<p><font face="Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular" size="2">Under the Consumer Product Safety Act, manufacturers, distributors and retailers are required to immediately report to CPSC information about products that could create a substantial risk of injury to the public or that create an unreasonable risk of serious injury or death.</font></p>
<p><font face="Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular" size="2">In agreeing to settle this matter, HSN denied CPSC&#8217;s allegations that it violated the CPSA.</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.consumersafety.com/shopping-channel-hsn-agrees-to-pay-875000-civil-penalty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analog Cellular Networks to be Decommissioned in Feb &#8217;08</title>
		<link>http://www.consumersafety.com/analog-cellular-networks-to-be-decommissioned-in-feb-08/</link>
		<comments>http://www.consumersafety.com/analog-cellular-networks-to-be-decommissioned-in-feb-08/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumersafety.com/analog-cellular-networks-to-be-decommissioned-in-feb-08/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As reported by CNN: United States &#8211; The FCC voted in 2002 to allow cell phone carriers to begin allowing their analog networks to go offline beginning February 18, 2008. As this date is fast approaching, as many as 500,000 OnStar users will no longer have access to emergency services. It is believed as many [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As reported by CNN:</p>
<blockquote><p>United States &#8211; The FCC voted in 2002<br />
to allow cell phone carriers to begin allowing their <img src="http://www.consumersafety.com/images/cell-tower.png" alt="Cell Tower" align="right" /><br />
analog networks to go offline beginning February<br />
18, 2008. As this date is fast approaching, as<br />
many as 500,000 OnStar users will no longer<br />
have access to emergency services.<br />
It is believed as many as one million<br />
cell phone users will be shut out, as will about<br />
400,000 wireless home security systems.<br />
Many people are also completely unaware<br />
this shutdown is coming.</p>
<p>This is just one example of progress<br />
and obsolescence.  Next on the horizon is<br />
the advent and takeover of high definition video.<br />
Per FCC directives, all TV stations in the US will<br />
be required to broadcast in HD and analog will<br />
be left by the wayside.</p></blockquote>
<p>Today I was ticked off that nobody makes the Flash and other plug-ins for Windows 98 that the web browser needs to play kiddie games and other media.  A parent can&#8217;t even give their kids a hand-me-down computer anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.consumersafety.com/analog-cellular-networks-to-be-decommissioned-in-feb-08/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surprise! Unexpected Names for the Losers in Consumer Reports Annual Car Reliability Survey</title>
		<link>http://www.consumersafety.com/surprise-unexpected-names-for-the-losers-in-consumer-reports-annual-car-reliability-survey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.consumersafety.com/surprise-unexpected-names-for-the-losers-in-consumer-reports-annual-car-reliability-survey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumersafety.com/surprise-unexpected-names-for-the-losers-in-consumer-reports-annual-car-reliability-survey/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consumer Reports calls them &#8220;bad bets&#8221;. The top ten for 2007 are: BMW 7-Series Infiniti QX56 Jaguar S-Type Jaguar X-Type Mercedes-Benz M-Class (V8) Mercedes-Benz SL Nissan Armada Nissan Titan Volkswagen Touareg Volvo XC90 (6-cyl.) The winners (&#8220;good bets&#8221;) are not so surprising: Honda Civic Honda CR-V Honda Element Lexus ES Lexus LS Toyota 4Runner Toyota [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consumer Reports calls them &#8220;bad bets&#8221;. The top ten for 2007 are:</p>
<ol>
<li>BMW 7-Series</li>
<li>Infiniti QX56</li>
<li>Jaguar S-Type</li>
<li>Jaguar X-Type</li>
<li>Mercedes-Benz M-Class (V8)</li>
<li>Mercedes-Benz SL</li>
<li>Nissan Armada</li>
<li>Nissan Titan</li>
<li>Volkswagen Touareg</li>
<li>Volvo XC90 (6-cyl.)</li>
</ol>
<p>The winners (&#8220;good bets&#8221;) are not so surprising:</p>
<ol>
<li>Honda Civic</li>
<li>Honda CR-V</li>
<li>Honda Element</li>
<li>Lexus ES</li>
<li>Lexus LS</li>
<li>Toyota 4Runner</li>
<li>Toyota Highlander</li>
<li>Toyota Land Cruiser</li>
<li>Toyota Prius</li>
<li>Toyota RAV4</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.consumersafety.com/surprise-unexpected-names-for-the-losers-in-consumer-reports-annual-car-reliability-survey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
